In certain of my recent articles, I’ve discussed lottery strategies that use the bell-shaped curve performance of 그래프 characteristics. Many such curves are used by lottery players to improve their chances of winning the lottery jackpot. As with all of my articles, I was seeking to inspire some response. Well, I got that. But, along the way, it appears that I have caused a uproar about lottery jackpots.
It makes my day when lottery players get fired up about my favorite topic. Their excitement makes my day. I don’t mind controversy, actually, I like it. It is actually grist for my writing mill. But, in this particular case, it appears that I stirred up a hornets’ nest. So, in the interest of civility, a sanitized version of the complaints looks something like this:
Bell shaped curves may be great but lottery jackpots don’t act like that!
There is not any approach to put this nicely. My lottery critics are wrong absolutely and throughout the board. All lotteries follow these bell-shaped distributions, both in theory and, I state most emphatically, in practice! And, a lottery number analysis performed on any lottery would prove my point. I hope that makes my position on the subject clear enough for everyone.
Now, you desire me to back up what I have said. No worries. Had you been here with me at my computer, I would personally make my case by playing among the best games. I would personally start out by saying something like this “Go on and pick any lottery you want.” Then, I would go on to use my lottery software program to prove, that when it comes to lottery jackpots, I am right on the money.
This is how it would go. First, you would probably pick any lottery you choose. Second, you would probably pick a performance characteristic that interests you. Next I would display the theoretical bell-shaped curve of this performance characteristic. This could be an illustration of this among the very graphs that a number of you happen to be objecting to. Finally, I would personally show you the same graph depicting what actually happened using the actual winning lottery jackpot numbers.
For example, let’s say you chose the Florida Lotto. Shortly, you could have been exploring the theoretical curve for your last 372 drawings (over 3 1/24 months). Next, I would have shown the same curve in the winning lottery jackpot numbers. Surprise, surprise; a bell-shaped curve. What happened over the 372 drawings history is exactly what theory predicted. Within this case, both graphs would fit like a hand and glove.
Shocked? Don’t believe me? Do you reckon this really is some sort of parlor game? Or are you not impressed and have decided to dig within your heals and stick for your guns. All things considered, this may simply be an anomaly. Fine. We’ll practice it again. OK, you select.
This round you select the Mega Millions lottery. Again, I show you the theoretical and pnzeli actual graphs for that last 372 drawings. Surprise! Again, the graphs are similar.
Still can’t believe what you’re seeing? No? OK, go on and pick one more lottery. Then, the New York Lotto it really is. Well, exactly what do you know. The graphs really are a match. The lottery jackpot results will invariably match the predictions of the theoretical distributions. I challenge someone to produce a good example in which the theoretical and also the winning lottery jackpot distributions don’t match.
So, where do all lottery jackpots hide? At this point you ought to know, they may be inside that bell-shaped curve.